The Idea of Presidential Representation

An Intellectual and Political History

Jeremy D. Bailey

Does the president represent the entire nation? Or does he speak for core partisans and narrow constituencies? The Federalist Papers, the electoral college, history and circumstance from the founders’ time to our own: all factor in theories of presidential representation, again and again lending themselves to different interpretations. This back-and-forth, Jeremy D. Bailey contends, is a critical feature, not a flaw, in American politics. Arriving at a moment of great debate over the nature and exercise of executive power, Bailey’s history offers an invaluable, remarkably relevant analysis of the intellectual underpinnings, political usefulness, and practical merits of contending ideas of presidential representation over time.

Among scholars, a common reading of political history holds that the founders, aware of the dangers of demagogy, created a singularly powerful presidency that would serve as a check on the people’s representatives in Congress; then, this theory goes, the Progressives, impatient with such a counter-majoritarian approach, reformed the presidency to better reflect the people’s will—and, they reasoned, advance the public good. The Idea of Presidential Representation challenges this consensus, offering a more nuanced view of the shifting relationship between the president and the American people. Implicit in this pattern, Bailey tells us, is another equivocal relationship—that between law and public opinion as the basis for executive power in republican constitutionalism. Tracing these contending ideas from the framers time to our own, his book provides both a history and a much-needed context for our understanding of presidential representation in light of the modern presidency. In The Idea of Presidential Representation Bailey gives us a new and useful sense of an enduring and necessary feature of our politics.

“Jeremy Bailey’s excellent book is an important contribution to political science and history. Through its conceptual lens we recognize how the parties have used representational and constitutional arguments.

—Review of Politics

“With extensive analyses of both well-known and obscure texts, Bailey has made a strong case for the importance of this ‘enduring debate.’ His account is likely to become one of the core texts on the history of the presidency.

—Perspectives on Politics
See all reviews...

About the Author

Jeremy D. Bailey is professor of political science and honors at the University of Houston. His books include Thomas Jefferson and Executive Power, James Madison and Constitutional Imperfection, and The Contested Removal Power, also from Kansas.

Additional Titles in the American Political Thought Series