America's Founding and the Struggle over Economic Inequality
If, as many allege, attacking the gap between rich and poor is a form of class warfare, then the struggle against income inequality is the longest running war in American history. To defenders of the status quo, who argue that the accumulation of wealth free of government intervention is an essential feature of the American way, this book offers a forceful answer. While many of those who oppose addressing economic inequality through public policy today do so in the name of freedom, Clement Fatovic demonstrates that concerns about freedom informed the Founding Fathers’ arguments for public policy that tackled economic disparities. Where contemporary arguments against such government efforts conceptualize freedom in economic terms, however, those supporting public policies conducive to greater economic equality invoked a more participatory, republican, conception of freedom. As many of the Founders understood it, economic independence, which requires a wide if imperfect distribution of property, is a precondition of the political independence they so profoundly valued.
Fatovic reveals a deep concern among the Founders—including Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, and Noah Webster—about the impact of economic inequality on political freedom. America's Founding and the Struggle over Economic Inequality traces this concern through many important political debates in Congress and the broader polity that shaped the early Republic—debates over tax policies, public works, public welfare, and the debt from the Revolution. We see how Alexander Hamilton, so often characterized as a cold-hearted apologist for plutocrats, actually favored a more progressive system of taxation, along with various policies aimed at easing the economic hardship of specific groups. In Thomas Paine, frequently portrayed as an advocate of laissez-faire government, we find a champion of a comprehensive welfare state that would provide old-age pensions, public housing, and a host of other benefits as a matter of “right, not charity.” Contrary to the picture drawn by so many of today's pundits and politicians, this book shows us how, for the first American statesmen, preventing or minimizing economic disparities was essential to the preservation of the new nation’s freedom and practice of self-government.
“Fatovic’s analysis is illuminating and a useful corrective to more simple-minded narratives of American possessive individualism.”
“Well-researched and admirably written. . . . In sum, Fatovic writes to deny that the American framers would have put growing income inequality, chronic wage stagnation, and declining upward mobility beyond the active concern of constitutional government. Measured by this aim, Fatovic’s book is a slam dunk.”
—Review of PoliticsSee all reviews...
“[A] nuanced, textually rigorous study that shows the continued relevance of the debates over economic inequality in American political thinking for today and the republican ideas that have, sadly, faded from our view.”
—Journal of American History
“Presents a compelling case that the US’s founding generation was deeply concerned about economic inequality. Highly recommended.”
“Most Americans acknowledge our spiraling income inequality, but many worry that tackling it could cost us our freedom, and we are at an impasse. Clement Fatovic proposes to move forward by glancing back—to the Founding Fathers, who warned that if a republic really wants to stay free, it will guard against a lopsided distribution of property.”
—Woody Holton, author of Unruly Americans and the Origins of the Constitution
“In a sophisticated, detailed, and compelling manner Clement Fatovic explores and explodes the founders concerns over economic inequality. This is an exceptionally timely study given the current heated debates over inequality in contemporary America. A must read for scholars and citizens alike!”
—Richard Matthews, Department of Political Science at Lehigh UniversitySee fewer reviews...