The President Shall Nominate
How Congress Trumps Executive Power
Mitchel A. Sollenberger
The Constitution clearly states that the president "shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint" individuals to positions in the executive and judicial branches; yet the process may sometimes seem murky. While much has been written about the confirmation phase of those appointments, far less attention has been paid to the pre-nomination process—until now.
In this groundbreaking book, Mitchel Sollenberger takes readers behind the scenes to explain what happens before presidents publicly announce their nominees. A comprehensive history of this process, his book shows how political practice has shaped the use of a power that the Constitution declared must be shared by the executive and legislative branches.
“Sollenberger examines the pre-nomination process of how presidents arrive at their nominees for positions requiring Senate confirmation. . . . He convincingly shows the pre-nomination process as one that is and always has been an area of shared concern between presidents and the Senate, where both conflict and compromise have existed. . . . Solelnberger presents an impressive array of archival research in making his argument. In addition his project is not confined to an examination of the modern presidency, but goes back to the very beginning of the Republic, even examining the way appointments were handled before the Constitution. . . . ”
—Political Science Quarterly
“An excellent history of the process and the scholarly debate . . . Overall, a very good treatment of the issue.”
—ChoiceSee all reviews...
“An informative, comprehensive, and timely historical study of the selection of nominees for appointed federal offices. The book addresses the powers shared by the legislative and executive branches in the selection process, and how their roles have developed over time. . . . Overall, this book is a welcome addition to scholarship on Congress, the Presidency, and the appointments process. It is a valuable resource for scholars of appointment politics throughout American history, particularly those whose interests are not limited to the federal courts.”
—Law and Politics Book Review
“A highly impressive work of scholarship that is meticulously researched, clearly written, and makes an original contribution to the study of politics and law. Sollenberger’s study will become the standard source on the subject for years.”
—Mark Rozell, author of Executive Privilege: Presidential Power, Secrecy, and Accountability
“A fusion of history and today’s headlines, this book demolishes the arguments for a unitary presidential appointment power and restores ‘advice’ to the Senate’s advice and consent authority.”
—Donald A. Ritchie, author of Electing FDR: The New Deal Campaign of 1932
“A strikingly valuable and original study that will stimulate reconsideration and rethinking of fundamental principles of constitutional government in the United States.”
—Louis Fisher, author of Constitutional Conflicts between Congress and the PresidentSee fewer reviews...
Drawing on unpublished letters and papers of presidents, senators, and other public figures, Sollenberger unravels the way this struggle has been viewed and resolved from George Washington's day to the present. He reveals the extent to which the political process has shaped the outcomes of particular appointments and how these outcomes have reflected the fundamental principle of shared power. Along the way, he sheds new light on issues related to express and implied power, the validity of the unitary executive model, the tension between politics and professionalism, and the limits of originalism and textualism in interpreting the appointment process.
Sollenberger documents how the president and Senate have worked with or against each other in managing the pre-nomination process, examining both the tradition of the president's consulting with senators and the Senate's numerous ways of killing a nomination. He also shows how the two branches have often sought compromise rather than test public patience, yet another testament to the genius of our system of checks and balances. And while past observers of the process have looked most closely at judicial appointments, Sollenberger casts a much wider net, while critiquing the "spoils era," civil service reform, and implications of the Pendleton Act before concluding with George W. Bush and his appointment of Michael Brown to FEMA.
The first major study of the pre-nomination phase, Sollenberger's work asks important questions about our constitutional balance of powers and shows us how the appointments clause should ideally operate in a republican form of government.