In the Name of National Security
Unchecked Presidential Power and the Reynolds Case
When a B-29 bomber exploded over Georgia in 1948, the victims' families were denied access to crucial information relating to the accident because the federal government claimed such access would endanger national security. When the Supreme Court upheld that claim in United States v. Reynolds (1953), a new precedent was established, allowing the executive branch to assert an all-encompassing "state secret privilege" as a basis for withholding information from public scrutiny.
For more than fifty years that decision has been viewed with apprehension by a great many scholars and citizens, who feel it has fostered a dangerous cult of secrecy and undermined accountability by declaring that only the executive branch can be trusted with sensitive material. Now Louis Fisher, America's leading authority on separation of powers, recounts the story of Reynolds to reassess its lasting impact on our society.
“The book succeeds wonderfully. . . . It is a superb contribution that many readers will find timely. . . . [The Supreme Court's decision] earns Fisher’s condemnation; readers of the book will have a difficult time not sharing his judgment.”
—White House Studies
“U.S. v. Reynolds is one part of . . . a larger picture of executive usurpation that has sealed off the presidency behind walls of secrecy, unaccountability, and extreme legal theories of detention, torture, defiance of Congress, and spying on citizens. It is as part of that larger scene that U.S. v. Reynolds remains important, as a major early step in letting governments lie with court sanction. Because of this, the appearance of [two such excellent books] is especially welcome. Fisher is strong on points of law and their historical background. . . . If the constitutional imbalance created by the present administration is ever to be remedied, the true story of the Reynolds decision must be part of the assessment leading to a cure. ”
—Garry Wills inSee all reviews...
“Deeply researched, wonderfully written, Fisher’s book shines the light of reason on a dark and dense area of law too often abused in the name of national security. It is difficult to imagine a more timely work.”
—John W. Dean, author of Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush
“A ripping good story and the best account I have read of how the executive branch lies its way to power. . . . Fisher has become a national treasure and is the most rigorous and thoughtful contemporary scholar of our constitutional system of government.”
—William G. Weaver, coauthor of Law and Presidential Secrecy
“Fisher’s command of American constitutional law and development is without parallel.”
—Stanley Kutler, author of The Wars of WatergateSee fewer reviews...
Taking us back to a time when Americans were preoccupied with protecting military secrets from the Red Menace, Fisher shows how this case produced fundamental distortions in the judicial process that have increased with each passing year. He critiques the government's arguments in Reynolds from district court to Supreme Court and dissects the landmark opinion authored by Chief Justice Fred Vinson. He also explains how Reynolds affected subsequent battles over executive-held information both within the courts—the Pentagon Papers, the Watergate tapes—and between Congress and the president, as exemplified by the Freedom of Information Act and the much-debated Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Drawing upon declassified documents and interviews with surviving family members, he weaves a compelling story—one that took a new twist when it was finally discovered that the information originally withheld was not sensitive at all but rather revealed Air Force negligence.
Especially in light of the Bush administration's continued use of Reynolds to justify its post-9/11 claims to unilateral authority, Fisher's work could not be more timely. His book is essential reading for all who question presidential authority—and should be required reading for all who don't.