Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11
How One Film Divided a Nation
Robert Brent Toplin
In the heat of the 2004 presidential election campaign, no single work of speechmaking, writing, or media production fueled the fiery debate over George W. Bush's leadership as much as Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. Certainly, no American documentary film ever provoked as much political controversy.
A noted film scholar now offers a much-needed appraisal of both the film and the furor surrounding it. Robert Brent Toplin first examines the development of Moore's ideas and the evolution of his filmmaking, then dissects Fahrenheit 9/11 and explores the many claims and disagreements about the movie's truthfulness. Toplin considers the ways in which Moore based his arguments on a diverse array of "primary sources," many of which had received scant attention in the mainstream media—including the notorious seven-minute "Pet Goat" video depicting President Bush—either deliberately calm or paralyzed—in a Florida classroom on being told of the 9/11 attacks. Finally, Toplin considers the movie's impact, noting that some enthusiasts of the film thought it would help Democrats in the 2004 elections while others argued that Moore's strident approach to issues would turn off swing voters and contribute to a Republican victory.
“Engaging and well executed, this book manages to achieve what other critiques and examinations of Moore’s controversial documentary overlook. . . . Unlike many critics and pundits in the media, who have repeatedly attacked Moore’s film, Toplin’s approach exemplifies objectivity. He unabashedly points out the merits and the flaws of the film and gives each side of Fahrenheit 9/11 debate equal coverage, thus demonstrating what it truly means to be ‘fair and balanced.’”
—Film & History
“This book is both something of an audience study and a more traditional look at the content and meaning of the film. Toplin deftly combines both topics and produces a book that, while brief, is thorough, painstaking, and complete. . . . There is no doubt that Fahrenheit 9/11 is an important subject. Toplin presents convincing evidence that players from both the Right and the Left judged it to be at least potentially influential in the 2004 election. . . . This book is nicely written, to the point, and useful to those interested in the argumentative potential of contemporary documentary film.”
—Journal of American HistorySee all reviews...
“Providing interesting insights into the craft of documentary filmmaking, this book demonstrates how Moore’s films reflect traditional techniques and how critics have seemingly held him to different standards than they have others working in the genre. . . . Recommended.”
“While clearly on Moore’s side and convinced of the fundamental truth of the film’s argument—Toplin believes it ‘made history’—he concedes that some of its points could have been made less controversially. Nevertheless, the ‘most important message of Fahrenheit 9/11 is that the war with Iraq was unnecessary.’ Toplin is mostly addressing his political community, but film students may also pick up some valuable information.”
“This is a fascinating and thoughtful look at the complicated force of nature that is Michael Moore and the very serious issues of politics, partisanship, craft, and aesthetics that get stirred up in the wake of his films.”
—Ken Burns, filmmaker
“Offers insights into the ways that public debate about Moores film—by far the biggest box office success of any documentary ever made—overshadowed the film itself.”
—Michael Renov, author of The Subject of Documentary
“The best single source of detailed commentary on Fahrenheit 9/11 and the debate that swirled about it.”
—Bill Nichols, author of Representing RealitySee fewer reviews...
Critics lambasted Fahrenheit 9/11, claiming Moore violated standards of documentary filmmaking through his excessive partisanship. They also berated him for taking events out of context and getting the facts wrong. Toplin contends that partisanship is a well-established tradition in documentary filmmaking, and he shows that the major disagreements between admirers and detractors of Fahrenheit 9/11 revolved around interpretation rather than the factual record. Michael Moore took some controversial risks, Toplin demonstrates, but on many large and small matters-from his treatment of the Bush administration's reactions to 9/11 and war—making in Iraq to disputes about the Saudi flights from the United States after 9/11—Moore raised many legitimate questions.
Toplin's engaging study shows that Michael Moore's film did more than shake up a nation; it also made an indelible contribution to the esteemed tradition of agenda-driven cinema. Especially in the light of how some of Moore's views have been given added weight by subsequent events, Toplin's book should encourage a new appreciation of Fahrenheit 9/11 and its impact.