Henry Adams
The Historian as Political Theorist
James P. Young
Henry Adams has been a neglected figure in recent years. The Education of Henry Adams is widely accepted as a classic of American letters, but his other work is little read except by specialists. His brilliant journalism is out of print, while Mont Saint Michel and Chartres and the novels Democracy and Esther receive little attention. Even the monumental History of the Administrations of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, considered by some to be the greatest history written by any American, seems noticed only by scholars of that period.
James P. Young, author of the highly regarded Reconsidering American Liberalism, seeks to revive interest in the thought of Adams by extracting core ideas from his writings concerning both American political development and the course of world history and then showing their relevance to the contemporary longing for a democratic revival.
“. . . any theorist who wants to explore commentary on Adams should start with Young.”
—Perspectives on Politics
“This is an unusually intelligent, balanced, thoughtful study of a notoriously difficult writer and thinker. . . . An important book, possibly the best, broadest, and most original study of Henry Adams published in the past decade.”
—Choice
See all reviews...“A useful, complex, and intriguing description and assessment of Henry Adams as historian and political theorist. . . . It will be necessary reading for scholars of American political thought and enjoyable reading for many others, too.”
—Review of Politics
“A fresh look at one of America’s greatest writers. Wonderfully perceptive about the whole range of Adams’s work, it illuminates the patterns of his thought and the intellectual passions that drove his genius. An unusual and indispensable book.”
—George Kateb, author of The Inner Ocean: Individualism and Democratic Culture
“A penetrating analysis of Adams’s enigmatic political thought. No work on the subject does more to clarify the resistance of Adams's views to conventional ‘liberal’ and ‘conservative’ labels. Identifying the prescience as well as the bias of those views, Young discerns the abiding conflict between liberalism and civic humanism at the core of Adams's politics. A timely reassessment of Henry Adams’s continued relevance.”
—William Merrill Decker, author of Literary Vocation of Henry Adams
See fewer reviews...
In this revisionist study, Young denies that Adams was a reactionary critic of democracy and instead contends that he was an idealistic, though often disappointed, advocate of representative government. Young focuses on Adams's belief that capitalist industrial development during the Gilded Age had debased American ideals and then turns to a careful study of Adams's famous contrast of the unity of medieval society with the fragmentation of modern technological society.
Though fully aware of Adams's concerns about technology, Young rejects the idea that Adams was bitterly opposed to twentieth century developments in that field. He shows that though a liberal democrat with inclinations toward reform, Adams is much too sophisticated to be captured by any simple label.